The mom of a 10-year-old boy in New York was arrested for letting her child get a tattoo. Meanwhile, the people saying this is wrong are ok with giving children puberty blockers.
At least a tattoo is just external, still wrong, but the health complications are not comparable.
A ten year old can’t decide on a tattoo but a ten year old can decide on sexual surgery and chemical castration? According to modern day law makers a preteen can decide their own sex and take steps to alter themselves without parents approval. But tattoos are not ok, yes this makes sense.
A ten year old can't decide on a tattoo but a ten year old can decide on sexual surgery and chemical castration? Make it make sense!
